Atrial fibrillation: Rhythm control or rate control?

Photo of man taking medication
PantherMedia / Wavebreakmedia ltd

In , the normal heart rhythm can be restored using controlled electric shocks to the heart. Certain treatments can be used afterwards to stabilize the heart rhythm and try to prevent the from returning. These treatments include medication and a procedure known as ablation.

In , the electrical signals that regulate the rhythm of your heartbeat don't work properly. This typically leads to a fast and irregular heartbeat, which can cause symptoms such as palpitations, shortness of breath and exhaustion.

Treatment with medication or controlled electric shocks can often restore a normal heart rhythm (cardioversion). But the irregular heart rate returns in many people. Treatments that stabilize the heart rhythm (rhythm control) can lower the risk of that happening. The aim is to keep the heart pumping in a normal rhythm ("sinus rhythm") over the long term. That is achieved in 30 to 50% of those affected.

Rhythm control treatment is mainly considered in people whose keeps coming back and causing bothersome symptoms. It can also be a good idea in people who have heart failure (a weak heart, also known as cardiac insufficiency). If there are no – or hardly any – symptoms, treatment with medication to reduce the high pulse (heart rate control) is usually enough. Beta blockers are generally used to do this.

When is rhythm control treatment considered?

Rhythm control treatment has two advantages: First, it relieves the possible symptoms of . Second, it makes the heart stronger again. So rhythm control treatment is considered for the following reasons:

  • Bothersome symptoms: For instance, if symptoms like a pounding heart or exhaustion can't be relieved enough through pulse-lowering treatment and measures such as drinking less alcohol and losing weight.
  • An acute first episode: If you have for the first time or if you haven’t had it for long. It is thought that the chances of successfully restoring and maintaining the normal (sinus) heart rhythm will then be higher.
  • Heart failure (a weak heart): If you have heart failure as well as , treatment to stabilize the rhythm of your heart can be a good idea in order to help the heart pump better. Research also suggests that ablation can increase the life expectancy of some people who have and heart failure.
  • If is being caused by a treatable condition: If is being caused by another medical condition, such as an overactive thyroid gland, that underlying condition is treated first. If the rhythm of the heart doesn't return to normal on its own after that, cardioversion treatment is the next step. The heart rhythm often remains stable after that.

There are sometimes other reasons for doing cardioversion – for instance, if someone is very sporty and would like their heart to be as powerful as possible.

What are the disadvantages of rhythm control treatment?

The main potential disadvantages of resetting the normal heart rhythm are the associated risks and the limited chances of success:

  • Risks of cardioversion: Cardioversion temporarily increases the risk of a stroke. If anticoagulants are used before and after cardioversion, this risk can be reduced to about 1%. But there is still a small risk.
  • Risks of the stabilizing treatment: Both treatment approaches (a ablation and medication to stabilize the sinus rhythm) can lead to side effects and complications, some of which are severe.
  • Limited chances of success: Although it is often possible to restore the normal heart rhythm through cardioversion, the irregular rhythm can return after a while.
  • Limited advantages: Research has shown that – compared to heart rate control – rhythm control treatment doesn't increase the life expectancy of most people who have . It doesn't provide better protection from complications such as strokes in most people either.

Cardioversion may not be a suitable treatment option for the following reasons too:

  • The has persisted for over one year: Cardioversion is then not likely to be successful.
  • Older age: Particularly in older people, it's important to carefully weigh the pros and cons of this treatment.
  • Having certain other medical conditions, such as chronic kidney failure.
  • Practical disadvantages: People who have cardioversion treatment often need more check-ups and have to take more medication to prevent recurrences.

A lot of people still have to take medication to control their heart rate after cardioversion too.

What does cardioversion involve?

In , the normal heart rate is usually restored using electric shocks rather than medication. This involves placing electrodes on the upper body. These release a controlled electric signal to make the heart beat regularly. The procedure is carried out using an anesthetic lasting just a few minutes. Electrical cardioversion works in over 90 out of 100 people, and is often even successful in people who have had for quite a long time.

The normal rhythm of the heart can also be restored using a type of medication known as anti-arrhythmics (medication for heart rhythm problems, such as flecainide or propafenone). They are either injected directly into a vein or taken in the form of tablets.

How can the rhythm of the heart be stabilized?

After cardioversion, the normal (sinus) rhythm of the heart can be stabilized in two ways:

  • Taking medication (anti-arrhythmics) over the long term.
  • Catheter ablation: This procedure involves cauterizing (burning) certain areas of the heart that are often responsible for the irregular rhythm.

A thin tube () is inserted into a vein in the groin, and pushed along the vein until it reaches the left atrium of the heart. The tip of the is then heated, and the heat is used to destroy various areas of tissue on the inner wall of the heart. This treatment approach is known as radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Alternatively, extreme cold can be used to destroy the tissue by freezing it instead. This is known as cryoablation.

Anti-arrhythmics and ablation each have various pros and cons. It's best to talk to your doctor about which approach would be most suitable in your case. But it's always possible to try out medication first and then have an ablation procedure if the medication doesn't help enough or isn't well tolerated.

Because all heart-rhythm-stabilizing treatments are associated with risks and side effects, it's a good idea to find doctors who are experienced in the treatment of . Catheter ablation procedures should be carried out in centers that have enough experience.

What are the risks of anti-arrhythmics and ablation?

The possible side effects of treatment with anti-arrhythmics – particularly amiodarone – are thyroid gland problems, vision problems, , gastrointestinal (stomach and bowel) problems, and skin that is sensitive to light. These side effects usually go away if you stop taking the medication.

In very rare cases, medication to stabilize the rhythm of the heart actually causes potentially life-threatening heart rhythm problems itself. For this reason, some anti-arrhythmics shouldn't be used in people who have certain other heart problems as well.

The most common side effect of ablation is bruising in the groin area, where the was inserted. But it can also lead to serious complications. Damage to the heart, lungs, blood vessels or food pipe might occur during the procedure. Although these kinds of complications are rare, they can be life-threatening and may require emergency treatment.

What are the different pros and cons of ablation and medication?

A large study involving over 2,000 participants looked into the advantages and disadvantages of ablation and treatment with medication. Data was collected over a number of years. These were the main findings:

  • Both treatment approaches relieved the symptoms in most people.
  • There was a noticeable improvement in 90 out of 100 people who had a ablation procedure, compared to 80 out of 100 people who had treatment with medication.
  • None of the treatments can guarantee that the heart rhythm will stay normal: The irregular rhythm returned within three years in about 50 out of 100 participants who had an ablation procedure, and about 70 out of 100 people who took anti-arrhythmics. About 20 out of 100 people needed more than one ablation procedure.
  • The medication caused side effects in 4 out of 100 people. 1 out of 100 people had a serious complication such as a life-threatening heart rhythm problem, damage to the liver, and damage to the lung.
  • About 7 out of 100 people who had an ablation procedure had side effects such as bruising where the was inserted or temporary chest pain. About 2 out of 100 ablation procedures led to serious complications.
  • The participants needed fewer anti-arrhythmics overall in the years following their ablation procedure.
  • There was no difference between the two treatments regarding life expectancy and the risk of developing related health problems such as strokes.

People who have had an ablation procedure still need to take medication (anticoagulants) to reduce the risk of blood clots. If they still have symptoms or an irregular heart rhythm despite the ablation procedure, they may have to take other medications too.

What should you do after a catheter ablation procedure?

Most people can go home after 1 to 2 days. After the procedure, it's important to

  • keep the area where the was inserted clean and take care of the wound until it has healed,
  • have showers rather than baths in the first week,
  • avoid driving a car for the first two days,
  • avoid strenuous activities, and sex too, for the first two days, and
  • avoid lifting heavy objects for 1 to 2 weeks.

It's important to see a doctor if pain, swelling or redness develops in the groin area, or if a bump appears where the was inserted.

Agasthi P, Lee JZ, Amin M, Al-Saffar F, Goel V, Tseng A et al. Catheter ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Arrhythm 2019; 35(2): 171-181.

Asad ZU, Yousif A, Khan MS, Al-Khatib SM, Stavrakis S. Catheter Ablation Versus Medical Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2019; 12(9): e007414.

Bhatti A, Oakeshott P, Dhinoja M, Grapsa J. Ablation therapy in atrial fibrillation. BMJ 2019; 367: l6428.

Briceño DF, Markman TM, Lupercio F, Romero J, Liang JJ, Villablanca PA et al. Catheter ablation versus conventional treatment of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2018; 53(1): 19-29.

Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D, Ahlsson A, Atar D, Casadei B et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2016; 50(5): e1-e88.

Klein HH, Trappe HJ. Cardioversion in non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2015; 112(50): 856-862.

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Atrial Fibrillation: the management of atrial fibrillation. 12.2019. (National Clinical Guidelines; Band CG180).

Packer DL, Mark DB, Robb RA, Monahan KH, Bahnson TD, Poole JE et al. Effect of Catheter Ablation vs Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy on Mortality, Stroke, Bleeding, and Cardiac Arrest Among Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: The CABANA Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2019; 321(13): 1261-1274.

Risom SS, Zwisler AD, Johansen PP, Sibilitz KL, Lindschou J, Gluud C et al. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for adults with atrial fibrillation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; (2): CD011197.

Romero J, Cerrud-Rodriguez RC, Diaz JC, Rodriguez D, Arshad S, Alviz I et al. Oral anticoagulation after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation and the associated risk of thromboembolic events and intracranial hemorrhage: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2019; 30(8): 1250-1257.

Sethi NJ, Feinberg J, Nielsen EE, Safi S, Gluud C, Jakobsen JC. The effects of rhythm control strategies versus rate control strategies for atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter: A systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis. PLoS One 2017; 12(10): e0186856.

Smer A, Salih M, Darrat YH, Saadi A, Guddeti R, Mahfood Haddad T et al. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on atrial fibrillation ablation in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Clin Cardiol 2018; 41(11): 1430-1438.

Turagam MK, Garg J, Whang W, Sartori S, Koruth JS, Miller MA et al. Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Heart Failure: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Ann Intern Med 2019; 170(1): 41-50.

Valembois L, Audureau E, Takeda A, Jarzebowski W, Belmin J, Lafuente-Lafuente C. Antiarrhythmics for maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; (9): CD005049.

Virk SA, Bennett RG, Chow C, Sanders P, Kalman JM, Thomas S et al. Catheter Ablation Versus Medical Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Heart Failure: A Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials. Heart Lung Circ 2019; 28(5): 707-718.

IQWiG health information is written with the aim of helping people understand the advantages and disadvantages of the main treatment options and health care services.

Because IQWiG is a German institute, some of the information provided here is specific to the German health care system. The suitability of any of the described options in an individual case can be determined by talking to a doctor. informedhealth.org can provide support for talks with doctors and other medical professionals, but cannot replace them. We do not offer individual consultations.

Our information is based on the results of good-quality studies. It is written by a team of health care professionals, scientists and editors, and reviewed by external experts. You can find a detailed description of how our health information is produced and updated in our methods.

Comment on this page

What would you like to share with us?

We welcome any feedback and ideas. We will review, but not publish, your ratings and comments. Your information will of course be treated confidentially. Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required fields.

Please note that we do not provide individual advice on matters of health. You can read about where to find help and support in Germany in our information “How can I find self-help groups and information centers?

Updated on January 6, 2021
Next planned update: 2024

Authors/Publishers:

Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG, Germany)

How we keep you informed

Follow us on Twitter or subscribe to our newsletter or newsfeed. You can find all of our films online on YouTube.